This is a quick one. My husband comes from a particular family background, and as a consequence of it is often afraid of not being left with enough money despite his hard work (and he is a hard worker). As I said elsewhere, we are moving, and so expenses are popping up left and right, and I’ve noticed a certain anxiety in his eyes. Consequently, I asked the Heavens a bank statement.
My husband’s finances, Horary Astrology reading
Since I didn’t tell my husband I was doing a reading, I am the querent, and he is my husband, and therefore Seventh House ruler, Jupiter. His money is represented by the second house from the Seventh, therefore the radical Eighth House, ruled by Mars.
Jupiter is peregrine in Taurus, and conjunct Caput Algol, a malefic star that, some say, is connected metaphorically to losing one’s head. Furthermore, Jupiter is combust and approaching the Sun. Therefore, my husband is under great stress.
How are his finances? Well, Mars is its sign and face, angular and inside the Seventh House, which represents my husband. So his finances are good, and they remain in his possession. This may sound silly. After all, if they are his money, of course they are his possession. Still, it is comforting to see his money in his house: he retains control over it.
I believe this wonderful Mars testimony shows that, as it were, the fundamentals of his finances are solid, i.e., there is no risk of dejection, poverty, major adversity, etc.
That being said, this does nothing to alleviate his stress. The Moon is cadent, possibly indicating that the economy is going to be slow for a while, and it separates from a positive sextile of Mars, showing a positive financial recent past, and applies to a square of Saturn. Saturn shows restriction. In other words, while there is nothing to fundamentally worry about, the next period isn’t going to be the most prosperous.
I already have a partial outcome for this reading, which was done some weeks ago. As soon as we entered the house, after a couple of days, some household utensils gave up the ghost, including the fridge, and we had to buy new ones. Since Saturn rules the Fifth house, the house’s possessions, I’m wondering if that was what it was referring to, though this is stretching it quite a bit (they are our possessions, not the house’s). Alternatively, Capricorn is the second sign on the Fourth cusp, so Saturn would generally show the house.
The founder of BOTA, Paul Foster Case, proudly started his short book “Oracle of the Tarot” with the assertion that Tarot divination is not fortune-telling. The reason, he explains, is that fortune-telling is grounded in the belief in luck, chance or fate, while divination understands that everything is about our personality. The same statement is found at the beginning of the advanced BOTA course on tarot divination (Oracle of Tarot, without the ‘the’). Ann Davies clearly had a hand in rewriting it, considering how verbose the course is, but the substance was similar.
Paul Case was tapping into the spirit of the times when he made that statement. Since Tarot had the (mis)fortune of attracting the attention of XVIII and XIX century occultists, it hasn’t enjoyed a moment of peace: everyone wants to believe it to be not an obvious masterpiece of Renaissance art and Medieval philosophy, but an occult device made to transmit mystical knowledge unknown to most people (even though most people prior to the Enlightenment and the French revolution would have been able to tell you what the Tarot was about).
The same has happened to Astrology. Once a practical art for foretelling the ups and downs of actual life, it became the victim of the occult intelligentsia of the last couple of centuries and was turned into a hodgepodge of pseudomysticism, ill-digested psychoanalytic concepts and “it’s true if you believe it” New Thought crap.1
But this is not the whole story. If one takes the time to study, say, the Golden Dawn system, one quickly finds out that their traditional way of reading the Tarot is grounded in fortune-telling (just read MacGregor Mathers’ example of the Opening of the Key spread). Even the BOTA system, which derives from it, preserves very concrete meanings to be strung together into sentences, despite Ann Davies’ attempt to turn divination into a form of Kabbalistic meditation.
In other words, the occultist attempt at reappropriating the Tarotand Astrology (which in part continues to this day with some bogus theories about the so-called Tarot of Marseille, but more on this in another post) is only partly responsible for the divination/fortune-telling dichotomy. Much of contemporary occultism is grounded in the psychoanalyzation of magic and spirituality, which, in turn, is a defense mechanism against the death of the classical spiritual worldview. Yet, for all its shortcomings, it at least preserves some core tenets of the magical worldview.
But the problem with this is that while it does preseve in some ways the roots of the worldview in which divination can flourish, it has lost the intellectual basis for defending it. Intellectually speaking, even today occultism is largely stuck in the pre-WWII era, with its myths of scientific positivism, of constant historical progress and of magic as misunderstood technology (while I would argue the opposite, namely that technology is misunderstood magic).
Essentially, what has gone lost is the philosophical framework that allows us to keep together divination as spiritual practice and divination as uttering of concrete, verifiable truths.2 That’s largely because spirituality, in the post-XVIII-century Western world, was only allowed to survive as private indulgence in irrational behavior, a weakness to be tolerated.
Thus the split was born: 1) on one hand divination: a ‘serious’, and therefore unverifiable endeavor, a tool for vague self-reflection, cheap catharsis and shallow instagrammable aha moments. In other words, something that the small judgmental scientist constantly perched on most people’s shoulder could smile upon as at least benign, if not really true; 2) on the other hand fortune-telling: a crass or quaint superstition that is just a scam when it gets things wrong and just a coincidence when it gets them right. The little scientist can be free to frown on it. In other words, the distinction was born out of the guilty conscience of “spiritual” people, i.e., out of their subconscious scientism, as a way of telling themselves and society “I indulge in this silliness, but I am just quirky, not stupid.”
The occultists of yore were at least intelligent men and women who actually had something to say. They may have worked in an intellectually hostile environment, but they at least gave it their best shot, and for this they deserve leniency. What happened next is worse: that the already battered art of divination fell into the hands of stoned hippies and people with degrees in the most useless branches of socially acceptable knowledge. Then along came the Liz Greene’s and the Rachel Pollack’s (to make just two examples) who destroyed Astrology and Tarot even further. From then on it could only go in one direction: past life readings, divine feminine, empty motivationalism and strategizing, healing of generational traumas and all the attendant nonsense.3
Interestingly, the more contemporary divination’s fake husk rots, the more one needs to be intellectually dead to practice it, the more it becomes reintegrated in the higher spheres of society. I believe I already talked about a friend of mine who works for Google and has to endure meaningless meetings with tarot readers and astrologers because her boss is the manifestation-obsessed boss babe type. Nor are tarot readers a rarity in corporate America. This probably says something about how brain-damaged this kind of environments is. The nicest thing we can say about this part of society and this strand of divination is that they deserve each other.
MQS
This is not to say that Astrology or divination were unanimously accepted, but the debate was much more complex. ↩︎
This, by the way, is not a call to “go back” to some long lost good old times. I am no reactionary. Nor am I a progressive. I am a realist. ↩︎
By which, of course, I do not mean that there is not a feminine side of the divine, nor that trauma cannot be a real thing. I only mean that these words correspond to nothing but the most vapid pseudointellectual nonsense when coming out of most people’s mouths nowadays. ↩︎
Traditional cartomancy, like all traditional divination systems, is full of tips on how to handle spiritual topics. The difference with contemporary psychobabble is that in traditional cartomancy we deal with a spirituality that is rooted in the earth and in everyday life rather than in Mind/Body/Spirit section poppycock. As I often remark, in such systems spirituality is seen as the logical next step for someone who is acquainted with real life, not as a consolation prize for someone who is trying to avoid it.
The querent asked if her boyfriend believes in “a superior being”, by which I assume she meant God (“being” is probably a more reassuring term compared to “bearded guy holding a lightning bolt”). She places great importance on the topic, but he seems to avoid talking about it. This is a playing card reading. In the next days I will also post a Vera Sibilla reading done on a similar question by a different person some time ago.
A♥ – 8♣ – 9♣ – K♥ – 7♣
Seeing this, I asked the querent to draw three more cards to open the reading on the Ace of Hearts, which yielded the 2♠, the 2♣ and the 6♣.
The first thing I noticed was the complete absence of Spades (except in opening the spread, but that’s a very weak Spade). This generally bodes well for spirituality. However, there is also a majority of Clubs, which indicate struggles and difficulties. There is no need to interpret the spread card by card. The spread indicates a slow or difficult relation with the divine. Belief is not denied, but it is rendered heavy, problematic.
The first card is the Ace of Hearts, which can indicate “inner” issues, but because the first card in a spread can also represent the cause of a situation described by the following cards, I ventured to interpret it as issues relating to the home causing the querent’s boyfriend to falter in his faith. The three additional cards with which I opened the spread on the Ace of Hearts reinforced my idea that there must have been a difficult atmosphere at home surrounding the topic.
What about the King of Hearts? Is it the dad? Well, no. Traditionally, in spiritual readings the King of Hearts is God himself (just like in the Sibilla): he is the lord (King) of your inner life (Hearts). Surrounded by all those Clubs, the God-side of the boyfriend’s life suffers, is stifled. Yet it is there, since the King of Hearts comes up and is not surrounded by Spades.
I asked the querent to give another three cards to open the spread on the King of Hearts. These were the 10♠, the 4♣ and the 10♥. At night (Ten of Spades) he speaks (Four of Clubs) spiritually/finding consolation (Ten of Hearts). He prays to God at night.
Abano discusses matters related to the First House. and Second House
Having shown in the first book how one may know and judge (questions), we must now show some practical examples of this science according to the twelve houses of the chart, so that everyone may more easily understand what they wish to know. And this always according to the above described rule of giving the first house to the querent and the appropriate one to the quesited.
First House
Of the life of the man or woman.1 Having made the chart and the fifteenth figure, and wanting to know one’s fortune or misfortune,2 consider the figure in the first house and, depending on its meaning and the virtue of the planet ruling this figure, judge whether it is good or bad.
And if you want further clues, look whether the figure moves toward one of the angles or in more than one of them.3 And the life is all the more long and better and fortunate depending on how good the angle is, as said before.4 And if the figure doesn’t move, but it is still good and fortunate, it means one still has a long time to live, but is lonely.5 And if it moves to the second, it causes gain through one’s industriousness and solicitude. And if it moves to the third, it means getting along with younger relatives and siblings, and if to the fourth, it indicates increase of patrimony and wealth of the father or of the older relatives.
If to the fifth, it means happiness through children, and usefulness, but if to the sixth, misfortune, tragedy, accidents, but also other people’s service (to the querent), depending on whether the figure is fortunate or not. If it moves to the seventh, it means good things from the wife or girlfriend, and good deals, or gain through war or gambling, and maybe in a foreign country, depending on the quality and condition of the figure. If it moves to the eighth, the life is short, unless one is a butcher or deals in dead animals, that is, skin, wool, or if one is a loan shark.6
If it moves to the ninth, it means much journeying, and being a knight or a wayfarer or a churchman, and the person’s luck is better if the figure is good. If it moves to the tenth, it means honors and public office and receiving dignity from people up high, or through them, depending as the figure is fortunate or not. If it moves to the eleventh, it shows good luck with friends and from people who are noble or from the Roman Curia. If it moves to the twelfth, the person will meet his end in prison, or through long infirmity, or it shows being kidnapped or being in a remote place like some religious people do.
If the figure shows up as a Witness or as the Judge, the person’s fortune depends on how good the figure is. And what we have said of the first figure, whether it is good, mediocre or bad depends on its nature.
Second House
Of wealth, possessions and gain. If you want to know about merchandise, one must judge the first house, whether it is good or bad, and then the second, depending on its virtue, and judge thus: if it contains one figure among Acquisitio, Major, Conjunctio, Caput and Albus, it means that gain will come from things that are easily movable from place to place, or from things that change, or that are sold by approximation (that is, without carefully weighing them).
If it were Puer it signifies gain through things sold after careful weighing. If it were Puella, it means gain through things that are easily obtained. If it were Rubeus, it means in things that cause fire or that have to do with blood. If it were Amissio, Cauda or Via, it shows little gain, and if it were Tristitia or Carcer, it means ups and downs of fortune or possessions. And if it is Laetitia or Minor, it means being able to keep one’s possessions. If it is Populus, then it depends on how good the first figure is, however by its own nature it means abundance. Note that every entering figure indicates gain or buying, and exiting indicates loss or selling.7
Whether one will retrieve the lost possession. If the question is about lost items, or stolen items, and we want to know whether we will get them back, look at the first figure, whether it is good or not, and then the second, and if they are entering or exiting. Afterwards, if you are looking for the thing, look at the tenth figure, if it is entering and good it means retrieval of the lost thing, especially if the same figure is in the second, or if here is another figure that is entering.8 Also look at the eleventh and the fifteenth. If instead the figures are exiting or bad, it means the opposite.
If you are looking for a stolen item, look at the seventh house, if it is entering and fortunate, and if it moves to the second or first house, which means retrieval.9 Similarly in the tenth, eleventh of fifteenth. And if the seventh [figure] is in the third, it means that the lost or stolen item is in the house of a sibling or relatives; if in the fourth, in or around the house of the father or of the older relatives, or near the house or place were it was originally. If it is in the fifth or sixth or eighth it means it is far away. If it is entering, however, you still will get it back.
If one will get back the money they lent to someone else. The first figure is he who must receive back the money, the second is the thing that he wants to get back, and the seventh is the borrower. If the first and second figure, or at least one of them (especially the second) are entering, and if the seventh is exiting, it means getting it all back easily. Similarly, if the second and seventh are the same, that is, entering. But if they aren’t, it means the opposite.
MQS
Footnotes
The First House was often called “Life, Body and Wit/Talent” ↩︎
This type of question may sound vague nowadays, but it must have been common in the premodern era, as Astrology and Geomancy handbooks are full of tips on how to handle it. This was especially true at a time when one couldn’t just arrange an online meeting with the diviner and when one’s time of birth was unknown, so that one may have looked at other possible alternatives to know about their general fortune in life that didn’t involve the birth chart. ↩︎
the angles, i.e., the First, Tenth, Seventh and Fourth houses, are considered strong and highly performant, so they endow the figure with strength. ↩︎
I am not sure what Abano means here. The angles are traditionally arranged as stronger (First and Tenth) and weaker (Seventh and Fourth) though all are generally strong. He may be referring to this. Or he may be referring to the practice of assigning the angles to the four phases of life, so that maybe a good figure passing, say, in the Seventh, shows good midlife. ↩︎
Because the eighth represents other people’s money (being the second from the seventh). ↩︎
“Every entering figure” probably implies “to the exception of Tristitia”. ↩︎
It is not clear why Abano mentions the Tenth House. It is possible that this is because the Tenth House opposes the Fourth House of buried and invisible things, and thus shows visibility and coming to light. ↩︎
Abano does not seem to count the Twelfth house as being next to the First. He is not the only authority to do so. Possibly this has to do with the doctrine of the Company of Houses, or simply with the fact that, on the Geomantic Shield, the First and Twelfth houses are visually distant. ↩︎
This is intended as a collection of meanings attributed by some sources to the Major Arcana and Minor Arcana of the Tarot. I will add sources as I study them. If you have sources to recommend, hit me up.
If you are interested in a (partial) list of the meanings I attribute to the Major arcana in my reading examples and case studies, click here.
Abano explains how to judge the figures in the houses.
Furthermore you must know that when the question is asked by a person, it is not always the case that the first house goes to the questioner, according to the universal rule, but there are eight cases of people who have a special house assigned, and one must judge the question according to said houses. These are the Pope and cardinals, a prelate, the Emperor or King, a great Lord, an absent party, a bandit or thief, a servant, one who’s been chased off the home and an imprisoned thief. These you must judge according to the house that is assigned to them.1
Similarly you ought to know that those figures that are called entering are better than those called exiting, except Tristitia, which is unfortunate, and they have great positive power against the opposite figures, if they happen to fall in good houses depending on the question asked. All exiting figures are weak and don’t promise much good, except when one wants things to happen quickly. However, they are strong in evil things and when one wishes for evil things. Entering figures are those who have more points in the upper half than in the lower half, and exiting figures have more points in the lower half than in the upper half.
And if in a chart you find an entering, fortunate figure in a good house, but the opposite, exiting figure is in a bad house, the entering figure is said accidentally exiting and unfortunate. For instance, suppose that Acquisitio is in the First and Amissio in the Second. If this is the case, Acquisitio is said to be exiting and unfortunate, but only accidentally. And if it’s the opposite, i.e., Amissio in the First and Acquisitio in the Second, we have the opposite case. In the same way you must understand every other figure with respect to its opposite.2
Similarly, every exiting, unfortunate figure is strong in evil things, and every entering figure is weak against evil, except when one seeks things to be firm and late, although Laetitia, though exiting, is good and fortunate.
One must also in every chart and question see what is the first figure and that of the quesited, i.e., what qualities they possess, e.g., fiery, airy, earthy or watery, cold or hot, wet or dry, and what’s the planet of each. And according to their conformity (to one another) or their difference, so one may judge them together with the other figures depending on which is better and has the better planet, always keeping in mind the question and the querent’s desire. And every time that a figure opposite to that of the first house falls in that of the quesited, it couldn’t get any worse.3 And this same effect have Populus and Via, although both are figures of the Moon, and Minor and Major, although both are figures of the Sun.4
Additionally, one must keep in mind, in every figure and question, the geomantic figures that are assigned to each side, and see which is better and which is worse, and thus judge. The figures of the first side, i.e., of the querent, are the first, second, third, fourth, ninth, tenth and thirteenth. Those of the second side, that is, of the quesited, are the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, eleventh, twelfth and fourteenth. If the two parts were equally good or bad, judge by the fifteenth figure, and according to the comformity of the four angles.5
And if in any question a geomantic figure that is appropriate to that question falls in the house of the quesited, this is excellent, and if the opposite happens, this must also be judged. For instance, if the question is about travel and and Via falls in the third house it means well, and good journey. If the question is about gain and Acquisitio falls in the second it means good things and usefulness, but if it were the opposite [that is, Amissio in the second] it means the opposite. The reason for this is that the third and ninth house have, among their attributions, journeys and roads and mobility; and the second house is a good place for Acquisitio, which means gain and usefulness; and if there were a geomantic figure which means damage of delay, it means these two things. As such, we call opposite figures those whose fortune is the opposite one of the other, that is, Amissio/Acquisitio or Albus/Rubeus, and so on. And so also Via and Populus, both being mobile, but Via is quicker and good for travel by road, while Populus is slower and bodes well for travel by water.
The example we have discussed can be applied to any other question, looking for appropriate figures and houses in the way we have explained. In the example of a question of gain, if there was Amissio [in the second], it signifies what its name promises, i.e., damage and loss, and whenever you seek to obtain anything or if you ask about an absent party or a messenger or any other similar issue, and if Laetitia was in the second house, or in the house of the quesited, it means happiness and pleasure, and the obtaining of what one wishes, and good outcome. But if there was Tristitia it means the opposite, because Tristitia means problems, except in earthy and fixed things that don’t move, and these (negative) effects will be so much the more true when in the second house (or in the house of the quesited) we find this figure, or a similar figure.
End of the first book.
MQS
Footnotes
There seems to have been considerable debate in the Middle Ages concerning whether the querent in horary questions was always represented by the First House or if certain people, such as kings or priests, ought to be considered according to their particular house (for instance, kings from the Tenth, priests from the Ninth). I advise against Abano’s practice. The querent is the querent, and as such is the First House. If the querent asks about the king, then the house of the quesited is the Tenth. Besides, but if the king asks about something, he is represented by the Ascendant, Abano does not explain how an absent party might ask a question without ceasing to be absent. ↩︎
This passage is exceedingly obscure. It is not clear how we are supposed to distinguish good from bad houses. The second house may have been considered bad by some Hellenistic astrology due to the fact that it doesn’t behold the ascendant, but I am wondering if what Abano is referring to here is the company of houses. Alternatively, it seems that whenever a bad figure is in a bad house and said figure is the opposite of a the good one, then the bad hurts the good even if there is no contact between them. Abano says that the opposite is also true, but this seems to lead to a regressus ad infinitum. ↩︎
I believe Abano is referring, as before, to figures that are the opposite in terms of points, such as Acquisitio and Amissio. However, later Abano says opposite figures are opposite in terms of fortune. ↩︎
I do not understand this. Does this mean that it is bad if the said figures are in the house of the quesited? This seems hardly likely. ↩︎
This passage is very interesting, as it shows the geomantic shield to be a sort of soccer field with two contenders. However, it is hard to reconcile what Abano says here with what he said before, for instance that it is better to have the fourteenth figure good than the thirteenth, because the former signifies the future. That being said, a certain digree of ambiguity about this issue is to be found in most texts on Geomancy. ↩︎
Here Abano describes the meaning and function of the Geomantic Court.
In order to have better cognition of all that one wishes to know, one must consider the thirteenth and fourteenth figure, which are called the Witnesses, because they unveil many secrets, depending on the good or evil nature of the figures they contain. And one must also consider the fifteenth figure, called the Judge, which shows the end of the matter for good or ill, together with the figure in the fourth house.1
The thirteenth figure signifies the past, but also the present, depending on the question, while the fourteenth the future.2 When the thirteenth and fourteenth figures are good, it means the question asked is positively answered, especially if the Judge is also good, but when the thirteenth figure is evil and the fourteenth good there is some trouble, and if the thirteenth is good and the fourteenth evil, then the question has a negative answer, especially if the Judge is evil. 3
If both Witnesses are evil and the Judge good, one must refer to the fourth house and judge from it what shall come to pass. Similarly, if the Right Witness is good and the Judge evil, one must look at the fourth to consider whether the matter will end in joy or sorrow.
If, after all this, there were still doubts, take the fifteenth and the first figures and add them to create another figure, and judge depending on the nature of this figure. And if this figure happens to fall in any of the houses, good or evil will come from a person or thing signified by that house. This sixteenth figure is called the Judge of the Judge [Sopraiudice].
Furthermore, this sixteenth figure is produced also from the Judge and from the figure in the house of the quesited, according to the properties of the houses as described before, and according as said figure is conform or not conform to the fifteenth or sixteenth figure, so one judges the chart of the question.4 And when they are good, all the better, and when they are bad, all the worse. And when they contradict each other it is also somewhat bad. But when they are in everything opposed to the fifteenth and sixteenth, the chart is null and void, and the chart is called anomalous, without order or rule. 5
MQS
Footnotes
Here Abano seems to put the Judge and the Fourth house on the same plane. ↩︎
This idea seems to stem from astrology, where the Moon’s previous aspect indicates the present or the past, and the one she makes immediately after shows the future. ↩︎
The way Abano describes the interrelation of the Witnesses with the Judge almost seems to make the Witnesses more important than the Judge. ↩︎
This additional technique begs a couple of questions. First off, why does Abano call both figures ‘the sixteenth figure’? Are they on the same plane? Secondly, is this technique always employed whenever the traditional Judge of the Judge (from the Judge and the First Mother) is used? ↩︎
In other words, this seems to have been taken as a sign that the chart didn’t answer the question. Personally, I am skeptical of this technique. It is my experience that charts are always radical, whether they are astrological charts or geomantic shields. They always answer, or at the very least they are always meaningful. Clearly, if we keep making up new figures, the chances of them contradicting each other increase accordingly. But contradiction is not a sign that a chart is not valid: only that it mirrors a complex, contradictory reality. Maybe I am wrong. ↩︎
Following up on my previous post about Sibilla cards that show loss, today we discuss the opposite idea, i.e., that of gain. As usual, the list is not meant to be exclusive, and gain is not the only meaning of the following cards.
Six of Hearts (Money)
As the main significator card for money, the 6♥ often shows the querent’s (or another person’s) liquid assets. By itself it doesn’t necessarily show increase of money, but it can indicate that a situation will bring money, and so increase can be implied in the context.
Eight of Hearts (Hope)
The 8♥ can indicate investments, but more in general it shows a favorable situation, so if gain is looked for, it will probably come.
Ace of Clubs Reversed (Marriage)
When reversed, the Ace of Clubs can indicate wealth. However, it is a neutral card, so if followed by negative cards it can point to loss of wealth. By itself it speaks not only of money but of property in general.
Two of Clubs (the Peacock)
Being the talisman card of the deck, the 2♣ represents prosperity. It shows freedom from want and positive situations all around (the Peacock’s wheel is the counterpart to the World card’s garland in the tarot).
Five of Clubs (Fortune)
Both upright and reversed, the Fortune card shows positive situations and movement in the querent’s life, especially as it pertains to finances, so gain is implied. When reversed, the positivity is diminished or delayed.
Six of Clubs (Surprise)
Even in its design the card represents obtaining money. It can shows the querent’s income in general, but more specifically it indicates money coming in, usually without much effort on the querent’s part (it is a surprise, after all).
Seven of Clubs (Realization)
Although this card is geared more toward the querent’s patrimony or realization in the world, it can imply prosperous finances and its power is greater than that of the preceding card. When the 5♣, 6♣ and 7♣ fall together they represents major wealth.
Ten of Clubs Reversed (Levity)
When reversed, the Ten of Clubs indicates the ability to manage one’s finances wisely and to save. It can also represent lucky opportunities to make money, and by itself it can show a small sum of money coming in.
Ace of Diamonds (Room)
This one is a card of material prosperity. When upright, it can represent a well-balanced checkbook or positive upcoming news concerning one’s finances. Reversed it can show the same, but with bad cards it points to mismanagement.
Three of Diamonds (Gift)
It can be a literal gift, of course, but often it represents the act of receiving or being offered something. This can be very comforting for someone waiting for a loan to be approved. It is also a card of luxury, so gain is implied in some way.
Eight of Diamonds (Handmaid)
This one is the card of money coming and going. When upright, it usually shows money coming in, positive financial evolution and ascent. Like the Gift card, the 8♦ can represent the idea of receiving.
King of Diamonds (Merchant)
In the main this is the card of work and career. However, it is still a merchant, so it can be indicative of business, banking and money changing hands.
Abano quickly summarises the meanings of the planets in traditional Western astrology, so that the geomancer may better understand the meanings of the corresponding figures.
In order to make it even easier to make a judgment, we shall now consider the planet of every figure, and conveniently we shall list the virtue and meaning of every planet.1
Saturn is always evil, wherever it is, and it means sick or vile people, malady, poverty, blind or maimed people, laborers, problems and toil, prison and prisoners. Adversities and obstacles, loss of wealth. It is only good for building and in agriculture and in things that need to last. Its two figures are Tristitia and Carcer.
Jupiter is always good, wherever it is, and it means Church people, prelates, noblemen, rich people, merchants, captains, courtesans and friendly people. It is good and pleasurable, useful in every thing. It is only bad for the sick and the prisoner, whose trouble it prolongs. Its figures are Acquisitio and Laetitia. Acquisitio is the better one.
Mars is sometimes good and sometimes bad, depending on the question, but inclining to evil, and it means malicious people, wrongdoers, traitors, thieves, ruffians, harlots, murderers. It is only good in things of wars and when blood is concerned. Its figures are Puer and Rubeus, and Puer is the worse one.2
Venus is good, but its goodness is minor, for good or ill, depending on the question asked. It means people who are friendly, happy, young, with little troubles in life. But also harlots. Its figures are Puella and Amissio. Puella is the more noxious for travel and sickness and prison. Amissio is the better one.3
Mercury is a mixed planet in terms of good and evil. It means servants, messengers, letters, embassies, writers, scholars and painters, science and doctrine. Its figures are Albus and Conjunctio. Conjunctio is the worse one, as it always shows malicious intention or duplicity, and hexes.
The Sun and Moon are mixed planets in their good and evil import depending on the question, but the Sun is the better of the two,4 and it means nobles, kings, emperors and people of high station, who have dominion. Its figures are Fortuna Major and Fortuna Minor. Minor means more trouble than prosperity.
The Moon is also a mixed planet, but mostly bad, and its figures are Via and Populus. Via is only good for travel, Populus is good for dealing with people, and it means abundance and lots of water.
Caput and Cauda are associated with the planets Jupiter and Venus (Caput) and Mars and Saturn (Cauda).5
MQS
Footnotes
The elaborate psychological attributes that modern astrology assigns to the twelve zodiac signs are virtually unknown to premodern Astrology, having been invented relatively recently to make up for modern astrology’s inability to make verifiable predictions. Instead, traditional astrology relies much more heavily on the planets as celestial actors. ↩︎
This is not the first time Abano alludes to Puer being worse than Rubeus, although in other places he seems to contradict this statement. ↩︎
This statement is also odd, and it reeks of either mistake or blind. ↩︎
In Medieval Astrology the Sun was often considered a benefic when aspecting other planets, but a malefic in conjunction (planets conjunct to the Sun are said to be combust or burned up, except when they are very close, in which case they are said to be in the heart of the Sun and strengthened). The Moon’s evaluation, quite ironically, fluctuated depending on the author, but in general she was believed to be a benefic when waxing and a malefic when waning. ↩︎
The practice of assigning the two Nodes to the benefics and malefics seems to have started possibly with Medieval Muslim philosophers, or at least in the Latin West. In the original Western tradition, the Hellenistic one, there doesn’t seem to have been much talk of the Nodes except in negative terms. ↩︎
(Note: this is a collection of the meanings attributed to the cards by some occultists in the past centuries. It does not reflect my own study or opinion of the cards. It is only meant as a quick comparative reference as I develop my own take.)
The Page of Swords from the BOTA (Builders of the Adytum) Tarot deck
Paul Foster Case (and Ann Davies)
The time period is from the beginning of Libra to the end of Sagittarius, September 23 to December 21. Meanings: a young person of either sex. Artistic, active, generous. Capable of weighing evidence, somewhat interested in occultism, philosophy or religion. Naturally aspiring, graceful. If Ill-Dignified: frivolous, cunning and prodigal Light brown hair and blue eyes (From the Oracle of Tarot course)
A. E. Waite
A lithe, active figure holds a sword upright in both hands, while in the act of swift walking. He is passing over rugged land, and about his way the clouds are collocated wildly. He is alert and lithe, looking this way and that, as if an expected enemy might appear at any moment. Divinatory Meanings: Authority, overseeing, secret service, vigilance, spying, examination, and the qualities thereto belonging. Reversed: More evil side of these qualities; what is unforeseen, unprepared state; sickness is also intimated. (From The Pictorial Key to the Tarot)
Aleister Crowley
The Princess of Swords represents the earthy part of Air, the fixation of the volatile. She brings about the materialization of Idea. She represents the influence of Heaven upon Earth. She partakes of the characteristics of Minerva and Artemis, and there is some suggestion of the Valkyrie. She represents to some extent the anger of the Gods, and she appears helmed, with serpent-haired Medusa for her crest. She stands in front of a barren altar as if to avenge its profanation, and she stabs downward with her sword. The heaven and the clouds, which are her home, seem angry.
The character of the Princess is stern and revengeful. Her logic is destructive. She is firm and aggressive, with great practical wisdom and subtlety in material things. She shews great cleverness and dexterity in the management of practical affairs, especially where they are of a controversial nature. She is very adroit in the settlement of controversies.
If ill-dignified, all these qualities are dispersed; she becomes incoherent, and all her gifts tend to combine to form a species of low cunning whose object is unworthy of the means.
In the Yi King, the earthy part of Air is represented by the 18th hexagram, Ku. This means “troubles”; it is, for all practical and material matters. The most unhappy symbol in the book. All the fine qualities of Air are weighed down, suppressed, suffocated.
People thus characterized are slow mentally, the prey of constant anxiety, crushed by every kind of responsibility, but especially in family affairs. One of both of the parents will usually be found in the aetiology.
It is hard to understand line 6, which “shows us one who does not serve either king or feudal lord, but in a lofty spirit prefers to follow his own bent”. The explanation is that a Princess as such, being “the throne of Spirit”, may always have the option of throwing everything overboard, “blowing everything sky high”. Such action would account for the characteristics above given for the card when well dignified. Such people are exceedingly rare; and, naturally enough, they appear often as “Children of misfortune”. Nevertheless, they have chosen aright, and in due season gain their reward. (From the Book of Thoth)
Golden Dawn’s Book T
AN AMAZON figure with waving hair, slighter than the Rose of the Palace of Fire. Her attire is similar. The Feet seem springy, giving the idea of swiftness. Weight changing from one foot to another and body swinging around. She is a mixture of Minerva and Diana: her mantle resembles the AEgis of Minerva. She wears as a crest the head of the Medusa with serpent hair. She holds a sword in one hand; and the other rests upon a small silver altar with grey smoke (no fire) ascending from it. Beneath her feet are white clouds. Wisdom, strength, acuteness; subtlety in material things: grace and dexterity. If ill dignified, she is frivolous and cunning. She rules a quadrant of the heavens around Kether. Earth of Air
Etteilla
Observer Upright. This card, as far as the medicine of the spirit is concerned, means, in its natural position: Spy, Curious, Observer, Scrutinizer, Collector, Overseer, Intending. – Examination, Note, Observation, Annotation, Speculation, Account, Calculation, Conjecture. – Scientist, Artist. Reversed. Unexpected, Suddenly, Suddenly, Suddenly. – Stunning, Astonishing, Inopinently. – Improvise, Acting and speaking without preparation, Composing and acting sitting down.
