I’ve been having some fun with the answer spread with my playing cards but so far I had never used it with the Sibilla. This is an example of a spread I did two days ago, when hubby invited a colleague over for dinner. My question was simply how the dinner would go. It is a mundane question, useful for trying out a new spread.

The Sibilla is, thankfully, very clear here. The first column, the one that supposedly gives us the background of the question, shows hubby (the King of Hearts) extending an invitation (the Gift, a proposal).
The central column generally gives us the answer to the question. Usually, the Hope card, when reversed, makes things go up in smoke. Together with a card such as the Conversation, which talks about gatherings, clearly the appointment does up in smoke or is at least dalayed.
The final column usually gives us additional information. The reversed Ace of Spades is generally less dangerous or less disappointing than when it is upright, but another meaning it has is that of a repeated occurrance. What repeated occurange? The Reunion, i.e., another gathering card.
What ended up happening was that the colleague had to cancel on us to take care of her ailing mother, but we rescheduled for next week.
An interesting Experiment
According to Regina Russell’s instructions, we only read the cards in the answer spread in columns. However, let us try to read them in the order in which they were pulled, which is:
Gentleman, Conversation, Sorrow rev., Gift, Hope rev., Reunion
In this case, the situation doesn’t change that much. The Gentleman, i.e., my husband, repeatedly gifts an invitation which, with some delay (Hope rev.) ends up happening (Reunion). Though, to be fair, in this case I would have probably pulled an additional card to make sure.
MQS

Discover more from Moderately Quick Silver
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I am questioning myself now if the Sibilla can ever be wrong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sure, there can be a lot of factors that go into a reading that go wrong, and I am certainly not infallible 🙂
LikeLike