Previous / Back to Index / Next

Abano explains how to judge the figures in the houses.

Furthermore you must know that when the question is asked by a person, it is not always the case that the first house goes to the questioner, according to the universal rule, but there are eight cases of people who have a special house assigned, and one must judge the question according to said houses. These are the Pope and cardinals, a prelate, the Emperor or King, a great Lord, an absent party, a bandit or thief, a servant, one who’s been chased off the home and an imprisoned thief. These you must judge according to the house that is assigned to them.¹

Similarly you ought to know that those figures that are called entering are better than those called exiting, except Tristitia, which is unfortunate, and they have great positive power against the opposite figures, if they happen to fall in good houses depending on the question asked. All exiting figures are weak and don’t promise much good, except when one wants things to happen quickly. However, they are strong in evil things and when one wishes for evil things. Entering figures are those who have more points in the upper half than in the lower half, and exiting figures have more points in the lower half than in the upper half.

And if in a chart you find an entering, fortunate figure in a good house, but the opposite, exiting figure is in a bad house, the entering figure is said accidentally exiting and unfortunate. For instance, suppose that Acquisitio is in the First and Amissio in the Second. If this is the case, Acquisitio is said to be exiting and unfortunate, but only accidentally. And if it’s the opposite, i.e., Amissio in the First and Acquisitio in the Second, we have the opposite case. In the same way you must understand every other figure with respect to its opposite.²

Similarly, every exiting, unfortunate figure is strong in evil things, and every entering figure is weak against evil, except when one seeks things to be firm and late, although Laetitia, though exiting, is good and fortunate.

One must also in every chart and question see what is the first figure and that of the quesited, i.e., what qualities they possess, e.g., fiery, airy, earthy or watery, cold or hot, wet or dry, and what’s the planet of each. And according to their conformity (to one another) or their difference, so one may judge them together with the other figures depending on which is better and has the better planet, always keeping in mind the question and the querent’s desire. And every time that a figure opposite to that of the first house falls in that of the quesited, it couldn’t get any worse.³ And this same effect have Populus and Via, although both are figures of the Moon, and Minor and Major, although both are figures of the Sun.⁴

Additionally, one must keep in mind, in every figure and question, the geomantic figures that are assigned to each side, and see which is better and which is worse, and thus judge. The figures of the first side, i.e., of the querent, are the first, second, third, fourth, ninth, tenth and thirteenth. Those of the second side, that is, of the quesited, are the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, eleventh, twelfth and fourteenth. If the two parts were equally good or bad, judge by the fifteenth figure, and according to the comformity of the four angles.⁵

And if in any question a geomantic figure that is appropriate to that question falls in the house of the quesited, this is excellent, and if the opposite happens, this must also be judged. For instance, if the question is about travel and and Via falls in the third house it means well, and good journey. If the question is about gain and Acquisitio falls in the second it means good things and usefulness, but if it were the opposite [that is, Amissio in the second] it means the opposite. The reason for this is that the third and ninth house have, among their attributions, journeys and roads and mobility; and the second house is a good place for Acquisitio, which means gain and usefulness; and if there were a geomantic figure which means damage of delay, it means these two things. As such, we call opposite figures those whose fortune is the opposite one of the other, that is, Amissio/Acquisitio or Albus/Rubeus, and so on. And so also Via and Populus, both being mobile, but Via is quicker and good for travel by road, while Populus is slower and bodes well for travel by water.

The example we have discussed can be applied to any other question, looking for appropriate figures and houses in the way we have explained. In the example of a question of gain, if there was Amissio [in the second], it signifies what its name promises, i.e., damage and loss, and whenever you seek to obtain anything or if you ask about an absent party or a messenger or any other similar issue, and if Laetitia was in the second house, or in the house of the quesited, it means happiness and pleasure, and the obtaining of what one wishes, and good outcome. But if there was Tristitia it means the opposite, because Tristitia means problems, except in earthy and fixed things that don’t move, and these (negative) effects will be so much the more true when in the second house (or in the house of the quesited) we find this figure, or a similar figure.

End of the first book.

MQS

Footnotes

1. There seems to have been considerable debate in the Middle Ages concerning whether the querent in horary questions was always represented by the First House or if certain people, such as kings or priests, ought to be considered according to their particular house (for instance, kings from the Tenth, priests from the Ninth). I advise against Abano’s practice. The querent is the querent, and as such is the First House. If the querent asks about the king, then the house of the quesited is the Tenth. Besides, but if the king asks about something, he is represented by the Ascendant, Abano does not explain how an absent party might ask a question without ceasing to be absent. ↩︎
2. This passage is exceedingly obscure. It is not clear how we are supposed to distinguish good from bad houses. The second house may have been considered bad by some Hellenistic astrology due to the fact that it doesn’t behold the ascendant, but I am wondering if what Abano is referring to here is the company of houses. Alternatively, it seems that whenever a bad figure is in a bad house and said figure is the opposite of a the good one, then the bad hurts the good even if there is no contact between them. Abano says that the opposite is also true, but this seems to lead to a regressus ad infinitum. ↩︎
3. I believe Abano is referring, as before, to figures that are the opposite in terms of points, such as Acquisitio and Amissio. However, later Abano says opposite figures are opposite in terms of fortune. ↩︎
4. I do not understand this. Does this mean that it is bad if the said figures are in the house of the quesited? This seems hardly likely. ↩︎
5. This passage is very interesting, as it shows the geomantic shield to be a sort of soccer field with two contenders. However, it is hard to reconcile what Abano says here with what he said before, for instance that it is better to have the fourteenth figure good than the thirteenth, because the former signifies the future. That being said, a certain digree of ambiguity about this issue is to be found in most texts on Geomancy. ↩︎